Skip to main content

Review of A Monster Calls

Today I'll be mixing things up and reviewing a movie. And not just a movie, but a movie I watched before reading the book. It happens. A Monster Calls was released in theaters Christmas 2016, and while critics loved it and raved about it, audiences paid little attention. At the box office, it barely broke even. I knew about it only because I regularly read Roger Ebert reviews, and after seeing that author Patrick Ness wrote the screenplay and Spanish filmmaker J.A. Bayona (of The Impossible) directed it, I knew it held promise. But I didn't know the story. I didn't pay much attention.
Then, a few months later, I shelved this movie at the library the second it came in on DVD. But the cover stopped me.
Everything about it drew me in. The colors somehow soft and vibrant at the same time. The sleeping little boy. The hand of the tree. Why was the boy asleep under this tree? What was the monster, and why did it call? I was struck so deeply, I knew I would not be able to die happy until I had watched this movie. So it came home with me. Immediately. And here I am five or six months later, still thinking about it. 

This entire movie consists of four human characters: a young boy named Conor, his cancer-stricken mother, his fussy and grumpy grandmother, and his kind but absent father. (The fifth character is the giant, talking, metaphorical tree, or monster, of Conor's imagination.) We are in Conor's mind the entire time as he deals with anger, loss, and loneliness. He was played by 12-year-old Lewis MacDougall in only the second role of his life, and he was perfect. Something about him was so watchable. He was in every single scene, often alone, and after a few moments, I wanted to spend two hours with this boy. That is a quality of an actor that is so important, but so often overlooked. This boy was twelve and he nailed it. J.A. Bayona knows how to cast kids. All four of the actors did fine, understated jobs, carrying the heavy emotions without dropping them and letting the film become melodrama. The entire movie is a work of art, as beautiful and creative as Conor's artistic mind. Every new shot is a miniature masterpiece. It is also not a movie concerned with staying securely within one genre. It is a fantasy film, but it is not an action film. It takes its time, content to let Lewis MacDougall's eyes convey far more feeling than any chaotic, action-packed script ever could, and the result is as visually appealing as it is brutally emotional. 

I wanted to stay in this film, to linger in its watercolors, its foggy European skies, its wise trees and peaceful graveyards, its gentleness and calmness. It feels like a fairy tale, but it does not promise us that everything will end happily ever after. Instead, it tells us through Conor's father that "most of us get messily after...and that's all right." And maybe it can even be beautiful.


Popular posts from this blog

Review of Disney's A Wrinkle in Time

Last night my brother and I watched A Wrinkle in Time and I was really excited about it for some reason. Did it hold up to the source material? Well, I read the book ages ago, didn't really like it, and only remember a few key plot points—the missing dad, three weird ladies, the creepy identical houses, and Charles Wallace getting possessed, and ending up with purple circles for eyes...and all of that happened in the movie. Except the purple circles. So as far as I know, it was a faithful adaptation, but I'm not the one to ask. This review is about the movie itself, not as an adaptation.

In the first couple of minutes, we're introduced to an insecure, brooding Meg played by Storm Reid, her adopted brother Charles Wallace (I don't remember if he was adopted in the book or not), and Meg's new friend Calvin, who doesn't do much of anything except follow Meg around. Then we meet the three ladies, one at a time. Oprah is like twenty feet tall for some reason, and …

Review of The Princess and the Goblin

When I started out reading a beat-up library copy of 1872's The Princess and the Goblin, I had no idea it would end up being exactly the book I needed at the moment. In fact, for the first two chapters, it struck a serious nerve. There was no goblin in sight, and the princess was giving me a migraine. Sure, maybe Irene kicks off the adventure by exploring, but as soon as she gets lost or runs into trouble she flings herself to the ground crying until she is rescued. Do you have any idea how tiring this gets? I don't care that she's only eight. I happen to know a very plucky eight-year-old. Just seriously....STOP THE CRYING.

The entire book got on my nerves for several chapters, come to think of it. Why? This takes place in a village where no one can go out at night. Also, there's a creepily mysterious lady spinning yarn in a tower. This is all good stuff. Good stuff indeed. So why was I driven nuts?

Well, enter Curdie, bringing utter relief simply by being a character…

Review of Welcome to Ludicrous

Review of Welcome to Ludicrous by Virginia Henderson 

On page 37, the fussy and cynical Priscilla Pinwick describes the town of Ludicrous as a "train wreck." This could not be more succinct. I hate to use my unpublished story as an example here, but Ludicrous is a town that makes Glennerdells look normal. And yes, I just said that about a town called Glennerdells.

In fact, it was so crazy that for the first few chapters I had a hard time getting into it. But now that I'm done with my journey into Ludicrous and back again, I present the official review, the good and the bad.

The bad:
--It's a bit unpolished. Commas where there shouldn't be, incorrect grammar like "had went." Sometimes the wrong word was used, such as multiple times the word "corporate" was used instead of cooperate. Nothing major that muddled the meaning, however.

The good:
--Priscilla Pinwick's name. A+
--Food descriptions. Just for the record, food descriptions will alwa…